What's new
HomeContact usWhat's Nuking?Take ActionParties and PoliticsThe Nuclear Industry
The nuclear industry


The Howard government has been one of the most pro-nuclear governments in the world. Its record on the world stage is there for all to see. In the May 2000 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty talks, it was one of only a very small number of nations allowing the nuclear weapons states unlimited time to reduce their stockpiles of nuclear weapons. (Most nations wanted a clear time limits for this disarmament process.)

In March 2001 Australia was alone in saying it "understood" President Bush's wish to go ahead with the Ballistic Missile Defence System (BMD/Star Wars).

At the UN Climate Change conference in The Hague, Netherlands, in November 2000, Australia along with only Canada and Japan argued for nuclear power to be classified as a 'Clean Development Mechanism' under the Kyoto Protocol. And in the UN's conference on Ecologically Sustainable Development in US recently, it was one of only a few countries arguing once again for nuclear energy to be regarded as clean and green. The government body ANSTO (Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation) has been quietly pushing for the development of nuclear power in Asia, preferably fuelled by Australian uranium. (e.g. ANSTO has been giving nuclear advice to the Thai government.)

Australia's main involvement in the nuclear fuel chain is in the export of uranium from three mines - Ranger in the Northern Territory and Olympic Dam and Beverley in South Australia. Australia also has one small research reactor, the ageing HIFAR facility at Lucas Heights in Sydney, New South Wales. The government is facing strong community and some ALP opposition to its plans to replace this reactor with a bigger one, for which the contract has already been awarded to an Argentinian company INVAP.

The major players in the Australian nuclear industry are the mining giants, chief among them Rio Tinto which recently acquired (from North Ltd) the majority shareholding in the Ranger mine and the Jabiluka lease, Western Mining (WMC) which has the huge uranium and copper mine at Roxby Downs, and US company General Atomics (through its subsidiary Heathgate Resources) which recently started production at the Beverley mine. A host of multinational companies including Canada's CAMECO and French COGEMA and smaller local companies are out there exploring, and buying and selling leases, waiting for an upturn in the market or a return of pro-nuclear state governments in WA and QLD.

Internationally, though it has been going through an all-time low period which looked like its dying days, the nuclear industry has been given a new lease of life. With the election of president George W Bush, the US is renewing its interest in all things nuclear. The US is looking to hone its nuclear war-fighting capabilities with its Ballistic Missile Defence (Star Wars) system, and begin building new nuclear power stations. Whether his divided Congress and the citizens of the US allow this is another matter, although the recent Californian power crisis (a result of poor administrative planning) has rekindled public acceptance of nuclear power. Bush is also attempting to fast-track the highly unpopular and unsuitable Yucca Mountain site for a high level nuclear waste dump.

In Russia, the collapsed military apparatus of the former USSR has left a terrible legacy of nuclear contamination across the continent. Nuclear submarines are rusting away into the sea on the Kola Peninsula, and the area around the city of Chelyabinsk is one of the most highly radioactive areas in the world, following years of nuclear pollution and neglect. The Russian Parliament (Duma) has passed through two of the three stages of approval necessary to change their laws which currently prohibit the import of foreign nuclear waste. Becoming an international waste dump would give a huge boost to the ailing Russian economy while creating a deadly legacy for future generations. The USA has been lobbying intensively and there have been allegations of cash ($US) for votes in the Duma.

Europe presents a mixed picture, with the UK still doggedly pushing on with the nuclear experiment, while Germany has pledged to shut down the industry within 20 years and Italy has closed down all its nuclear plants. France, whose energy is 80% nuclear, could be approaching a turning point with pro-nuclear President Chirac calling (4 May 2001) for 'debate without taboo' on nuclear energy, in a bid to woo Green voters in next year's election. The trend towards deregulated energy markets, which can encourage more realistic accounting for energy costs, is an increasing threat to the nuclear industry.

Japan is showing some encouraging signs, with the Governor of Fukushima Prefecture indefinitely withdrawing support for the government's plans to burn MOX (mixed oxide) fuel in modified nuclear reactors. The MOX program is a central plank of the government's nuclear strategy, and the move is seen as a vote of no confidence by other prefectural governments. Since the Tokai disaster in 1999, there have been a number of setbacks in Japanese plans for more nuclear energy.

Driven to a standstill by community opposition, the western nuclear corporations have been pushing for south and east Asian countries to develop their own nuclear power (with very mixed success). In a desperate attempt for credibility, nuclear interests have been touting themselves as the only solution to the threat of climate change, despite the fact that the nuclear fuel chain emits huge amounts of greenhouse gas in the course of uranium mining and fuel refinement. The lesser greenhouse emissions from nuclear power stations would come at a cost of the deadly ever-present risk of leaks, accidents and the routine emissions of radioactive materials into the environment, and the as yet unsolvable problems of nuclear waste.

This makes it all the more important that we stand firm in Australia and send a very clear message to our political representatives: the nuclear industry is unsafe, unclean, unwanted and definitely not the answer to the greenhouse problem.

 

 

Cameco
The world's largest uranium producer. Based in Canada.

Cogema
French Government nuclear agency.

Heathgate Resources
Proponent of the Beverley Uranium Mine (BUM) in South Australia.

Paladin Resources
Perth-based exploration company with leases in Western Australia, South Australia and Malawi

Rio Tinto
One of the largest mining groups in the world, with a savage reputation and a grip on Jabiluka.

WMC
The Australian mining giant Western Mining Corporation operates the Olympic Dam/Roxby Downs mine in SA and is responsible for the radioactive mess at Yeelirrie, WA.

Pangea
Pangea Resources operates out of an office in Perth, WA and is backed by British Nuclear Fuels Ltd among others.

Southern Cross Resources
Canadian proponent of the Honeymoon Uranium Mine in South Australia.

 

ANSTO
The Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation

ARPANSA
The Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency is responsible for regulating the Australian nuclear industry.

UIC
The Uranium Information Centre is Australia's uranium industry propaganda centre, funded by mining companies with uranium investments.

UI
The Uranium Institute is a major British pro-nuclear think-tank.

IAEA
The International Atomic Energy Agency is the United Nations body set up to promote the commercial use of nuclear technology.

 

 

 


Top of Page
Some of our custom essay writing providers are available to the people.